Archive for July, 2009

Is Catbert in the investment business?

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

Those who read Dilbert will be familiar with Catbert, the evil corporate officer. Many of you also likely invest utilizing the services of some sort of advisor, who is attached to an Investment Firm of some sort. My experiences of late convinces me that Catbert has a relative (likely more than one) working in the investment business.

With these dealers, though I do not know this from experience, if you walk in off the street with cash in hand I would guess that there is too much of a problem. However, if you are established with one advisory firm and then decide to switch to a competitor, look out for Catbert.

Admittedly, at least some of the problem arises from the largely justifiable paranoia surrounding several recent, high profile investment fraud cases – Madoff, Jones, etc. The effect on investment firms has been that the regulatory and compliance departments have been elevated from relative obscurity to a ‘king of the castle’ position. They have gone from being relatively unimportant, often disparaged, pains in the preverbial *#)*, to all powerful potentates, reporting to the CEO throne rooms.

Since in the past Catbert el al were relative insignificant, there was little contact with them. But now, with compliance being king, they hold sway over ever increasing, self generating, blizzards of paperwork that the world must bow down to. Paperwork muscles are flexed and in the words of the Borg “You will be assimilated, resistance is futile.”

So this is how it goes – file out paperwork, small typo or undocumented oversight, fill it out again, no precise requirements but you have to guess what they are, fill it out again and so on. Also. fill in the specified form then later fill in the form to comply with the original form (not stated on the original). You get the picture.

Not to say the regulations to protect people the Bernie Madoffs are not good. They are. But the proper documentation of precisely what is require has not kept pass with exponential grow of the paperwork itself. Proper documentation would equal painless and efficient compliance. The blizzard would melt.

A cynical consumer who has watched the news and flow of event might also jump to the conclusion that all this compliance has more to do with avoiding litigation than any other concern.

Now this could be completely wrong, of course, but fighting endlessly repetitive blizzards of paperwork does seem to be at the expense of those more out of control of situation. A little more investment in proper paper flow and clear documenation seem in order…

Share

The Potter’s Freedom

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

Well, AR, the answer would be yes…

The Potter's freedom

Share

Minor points of theology?

Monday, July 27th, 2009

In a recent conversation with a church pastor, he said roughly – These are only minor points of theology. They don’t really matter. It is our community that matters. At the time he was commenting on one of the foundational points of the Doctrines of Grace but the issue would been the same if the comment referred to any other doctrinal point.
His point, as he proceeded to explain somewhat sadly, was that theology was divisive to Christian community and family. Doctrine was interesting, but not something to actual consider significant. We should not worry about such and just be a Christian community, concentrating upon community and family activities. Now I should that these activities do include worship, but only as a part of the community genre. He was saddened (which was the stimulus for the conversation) that members were not seeming to ‘get it’.

Since this conversation was on the phone and the rebuttal was not going to be quick or tidy, I let it lay for the moment. But is has left me shaking my head, not only for the pastor in question, but for the flock, many of whom I know are searching for defining doctrinal answers which they will only find in Christ.
There was not even a hint in the conversation or apparently in his thinking that some actual defining, Scritpural doctrine and a clear theology might be what was needed. I have to say that I find that incredible.

There seemed no recognition (or perhaps it would threaten the ‘community at all costs philosophy’) that the church must derive its core identity from correct doctrine, derived from Scripture. And that the community, family and other identities must flowing out from that central core. Purpose, as defined by God not man, must be the starting point. When that is not the case, the theology will always develop from the community values, in other words, as defined by man and not God. An identity defined by man is wrong and even with the best of intentions will always end up serving the world and not Christ (we can discuss the theology of that another time).

Interestingly, at the same time as the above scenario is playing out in his flock, he is disheartened that they are not really interested in Bible study or his preaching. He clearly does not see the conflicting message he is sending about what is central and what defines that church.

Moreover, those within the congregation who are actually driven by the Spirit to seek biblical truth and identity are drifting quietly away, left empty by a man-centered community with no biblical identity. Even if that community is centered upon things that are Christian in nature and do in fact accomplish good works, it is still not centered correctly upon the Lord.

A sad scenario in a time of worldly churches. The question is, what to do…

Share

Working on it…

Saturday, July 25th, 2009

Working on eternity he thinks…AR 'works' on

Share

The Lord’s Table – Format

Saturday, July 25th, 2009

What of the various presentation formats in common (and not so common) use in our congregations? Does the difference matter?

There seems to be two predominant formats. I will call them the formal and the relaxed (intimate).

The most common format seems to be the fairly formal configuration with silver serving trays for the elements – bread and little cups of a facsimile of wine (usually grape juice). This format is used primarily by the mainline churches, partly because it scales well to large congregations in terms of the time it take to execute. It is also generally more cohesive from a congregational viewpoint, since the elements are served and then taken in unison, with accompanying leadership from the platform. It also appeals to our traditional side emotionally. Nothing wrong with that in my view (since my views on the need which some see to always vary things are quite contrary).

The relaxed format involves the use of  actual loaves of bread, which are placed in strategic locations. Those partaking of the elements come to tear off their own portion. The wine (sometimes real wine), already in cups, is similarly placed and individuals approach and serve themselves as the Spirit calls. Because the actual taking of the elements is done individually, this format can be both more spiritually intimate but also not quite as corporately moving (in terms of simultaneous consumption).

There is also a combination format . The loaves of bread and the cups are placed strategically, partakers come up to take the elements individually, but they wait to consume them in unison, as lead from the platform. This approach is not as common.

From a hygiene point of view, the formal format is much easier to control, since access to the elements is much more controlled through the serving format. Preparation can be up to sanitary standards. Today this will likely become a very significant factor, as viral agents spread though common contact -  though at the time these formats developed this was not even on the horizon.

Having experienced both the formal and relaxed formats, and ignoring the logistics of very large congregations, I would have to deem the relaxed format to be more desirable in terms of communion with out Lord. However, there is definitely something to be said for partaking in unison that the formal format brings. It can noticeably bring the people of God closer together. In saying this, however, I have to state that I have heard people express the opposite.

In a medium sized congregation, and ignoring present viral agent concerns, I think that the more uncommon combined format might offer the best of both worlds. That is all, of course, personal opinion. Your mileage may vary, as they say.

In the final analysis, there is not biblically correct format. None is  ‘correct’ or superior. If it is assumed that a congregation of moderate size is desirable, then it is my feeling that the combined or relaxed formats are potentially more effective. I say potentially since the mood of the people and the cohesiveness of the assembly can change the whole picture.

I also would add that I think this is a lesser issue than frequency. As time goes on I am more of the feeling that the Brethren and some others have this right. The Lord gave us this ordinance to remember and draw close to Him. He did not proscribe that is should be only occasional. Why not do it more frequently and rejoice in the benefits?

Share

Master of all he sees…

Saturday, July 25th, 2009

The plot seems to thicken…

C and A get acquainted.

Share

The Self-made Pot

Friday, July 24th, 2009

The journey starts off on the wrong foot…

The Potter's clay

Share

Performance vs. Worship (Part 3/3) – What can we do? And how?

Friday, July 24th, 2009

In worship we must consciously strive to bringing God joy through congregational, not just leadership, participation. The intent must be that the assembly worship en mass, and that any leadership encourage that before other priorities.

Scripture is the thought of God, as communicated to us in a way and at a level that we can think it ourselves. When we think scripturally, whether it be in music or words, we think like God, as He wishes. Irrespective of the style of music, worship in which the congregation is brought into actively glorifying Him through a form of His thoughts will help avoid the problem and accomplish the desired goal. The emphasis of this thought is on God, not on the worship itself. Expressed in another way, the intent of the congregation is wholly vertical, not horizontal.

Lastly, this problem is much easier to avoid than to correct. Once festering, the nature of the problem means that the egos of participants are in play. This never makes for a tidy situation or an easy correction in direction.

Worship teams with correct doctrinal and biblical mentoring from pastoral staff, who are encouraged in related devotional activities, as opposed to being simply turned loose to provide good music, are less likely to see this problem develop. Ongoing, proactive leadership, as with many other areas, is a key foundation.

Let us truly worship our God together, with gentle leadership, gazing up congregationally at the glory and wonder of our God. Truly, as David said of the wonder of the knowledge of God “Such knowledge is too wonderful for me; It is too high, I cannot attain to it.” (Psalm 139:6Open Link in New Window). Let us express that wonder together, bringing joy to our Lord and change in ourselves!

Share

Performance vs. Worship (Part 2/3)- Now to the problem..

Friday, July 24th, 2009

Have you ever been in a service where the worship music becomes a performance first and foremost, with actual worship a close or even distant second? I would guess that you have.

The most frequent observable symptom in this scenario is that some or even all of the congregation stop singing and simply watch. This is especially blatant when a ’star’ worshiper on the platform carries the songs completely, as the congregation falls back, often drawing out chorus after chorus that only he or she is singing or playing, caught up in the seeming rapture in their performance. It may be more subtle than this. It all centers upon attitude as opposed to specific action. The participation of the congregational worshipers is stifled rather than facilitated. In the extreme, people will actually sit down after a time.

Folks, God is not honoured in this. His people are not brought closer to Him in the way Scripture proscribes. I would even presume say it does not bring Him joy though the congregation. After all, all of His sheep are commanded to worship. It is an anathema to biblical worship.

One might assume that this would most often be a problem in large congregational settings, with correspondingly large numbers of talented platform participants. Though that is possible, I have not observed this to be the case. In large settings there is often strong pastoral leadership and worship oversight. Assuming that the worship leadership understands the biblical principles, the problem does not develop. Also, there is usually pastoral mentoring of participants, sensitizing them to these potential problems. As such, they are unlikely to develop.

I have also not observed this problem in very small assemblies (eg. house churches and those of similar scale). They simply do not have the numbers and equipment involved to spawn the problem. The participation of everyone is clear due to the size. Problems of this sort are obvious and unlikely to flourish.

The traditional small to medium church setting is most likely the one to suffer in this regard. Though not the norm, this is an unfortunate by-product of some current attitudes. In this setting, one or two overly head strong, influential members can dominate the worship. Additionally, there may be weak accountability, or it may be over-ridden by the false (though common today) hope that this will generate growth. In this situation, a performance oriented theme can evolve, severely stifling real worship in the congregation as they are converted into spectators. As the paradigm plays out, more and more resources are dedicated to the performance and staging, and the congregation is ever more distant in terms of participatory, Christ-centered worship. In this setting, people often simply drift away for what may seem no apparent reason. The reason, of course, is that they are subtly disenfranchised from real worship, left empty, and must seek the opportunity to glorify their Lord elsewhere.

Share

Performance vs. Worship (Part 1/3)- Ripples in the pond

Friday, July 24th, 2009

I suspect that just posting this title will stir some people up. Few issues in the current church seem to elicit strong opinions and reactions more that the use, configuration and presentation of music in worship services.

For the moment, let us ignore the usual divisive issues of style, drums, etc. I would like to address what I consider a much more serious issue – the slide of worship into performance, and its alienating effect on the congregation. There are many aspects to this issue, from both sides of the platform, but that should not sidetrack the discussion. In the end all that matters is glorifying worship before God.

To quote a well know chorus “Here I am to worship, Here I am to bow down, Here I am to say that you’re my God”. Or more traditionally “Oh Lord my God, when I in awesome wonder, Consider all the worlds Thy hands have made,”.

Let’s start with theology, looking at God, where everything always starts and ends. The infinite God, who created this world from nothing at all, needed us not before creation. He was totally and completely self-sufficient in the fellowship of His triune nature. Yet He created us, for His own purposes, in such a way that we can bring him joy (Grudem, Systematic Theology, Ch 11). I agree. Scripture states repeatedly that to worship and glorify God is one of our primary, if not our most primary, purpose. Simply put, it pleases God. We, as His creatures, are commanded and exhorted to worship.

In worshiping in music in our formal Sunday services, we are bringing glory and joy to God, raising His name up. This has nothing whatsoever to do with any hint at all of the glorification or building up of ourselves through the act of worship. Any building up of the worshiper is solely as a result of the Lord’s work in him or her, not through the worshiper’s work in the task. This must be the approach if we are to be appropriately humble before almighty God. Any other stance leads directly to pride.

Share

MIA in Ottawa?

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

Well, admittedly it has been sporadic of late, and people have been asking me if I am MIA…

Blogging involves an interesting combination of participating in activities that give one something to actually blog about (as opposed to a running commentary on ones breakfast habits and the like) and then having the time to commit those thoughts to the keyboard.

The last while has been very busy in the areas that I usual like to comment on. Between leading two demanding theology groups, occasional preaching and teaching, taking up shooting, some College lecturing, starting another site dedicated to the Doctrines of Grace and some academic work, there have been LOTS of ideas that would make seemingly great posts. Yet the ideas have been sidelined by the time taken in activities that generate them.

That said, notes have been made (mental and ink) of some of the issues that fly by, and some issues seem to be timelessly common to particular activities. That to say that some blogging material seems to have survived.

So there we are, back to the keyboard, hopefully more regularly again…

Share

Christian Association – Exclusive or Inclusive?

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

A few thoughts on Christian association, be it in the church or para-church.

When is restriction of that association to subgroups of believers just personal preference, when is it required for group effectiveness, and when is it a clique? It is a tricky question that arises frequently within church and para-church groups.

We wish to be honouring and biblical in our actions and associations, yet we want to be comfortable as well. Where is the appropriate line?

Let us consider it from the point of view of ’small groups’.

We live today in a society that often considers (at least publicly) any stance that is not completely inclusive to be objectionable, if not discriminatory. Discomfort in one’s associations or even a lack of group effectiveness as the cost of appearing inclusive is often espoused as a good and laudable price. We are to be everyone’s friend. This is especially true in many Christian assemblies.

From my experience, people we tend to exchange new ideas and concepts in a framework that is not overly hostile, since being constantly challenged before an idea completely takes shape subverts the conceptualization process. Discussion can be good and productive, but shooting down the germ of concepts before they even completely form is not.

This is even more true when dealing with concept affecting the personal growth involving the inner struggles of Christian sanctification.

When it comes to formulating concepts on faith related topics, most people seem to need a very secure and supportive environment for maximum effectiveness. These issues are often ‘close to the heart’ and ‘tender’ while in the formative stage (if not still that way later). An overly inclusive group structure often produces a group demographic that promotes challenge and inhibits the requisite emotional safety.

If group dynamics are to benefit the individual growing Christian (and by extension, the assembly), rather than satisfying external political appearance, then control of demographics matters. Over emphasis on an open group make-up and the appearance of inclusive behaviour is badly miss-placed.

Groups, once constituted with a particular philosophy of inclusion, are very difficult to change in process. Any narrowing of the basis for membership or closing of membership after the fact is even more likely to be interpreted by those outside of even inside the group as discriminatory or ‘unwelcoming’, without regard for the group’s mission. This is particularly true when the group has been formed without any documentation. Members may not see the potential effect of open demographics until it is too late and the group dynamic has been compromised.

Bottom line -> Church and para-church groups wanting to best facilitate the growth of members in faith and conviction would be well to consider membership demographics carefully up front. The group formation philosophy and intent should be clearly documented before the fact.

Share